Blog · Integrations and data
Data protection in Ecuador and AI agents on WhatsApp: what the LOPDP requires
What Ecuador’s LOPDP requires when an AI agent serves customers on WhatsApp: notice at collection, automated decisions, deadlines and breaches.
What does Ecuador’s data protection law require if an AI agent serves my customers on WhatsApp?
The Organic Law on Personal Data Protection, published in May 2021 and with its penalty regime in force since May 2023, applies in full when an AI agent is the one answering. When collecting data you must disclose, among other things, the purpose, the legal basis and the existence of automated decisions (article 12). Access, correction, deletion and objection requests are answered within 15 days, and people may refuse to be subject to decisions based on automated processes, with exceptions (article 20). Since March 2026, a rule from the Superintendency requires disclosing the automated nature of AI processing. This is not legal advice.
Ecuador has had a personal data law since May 2021. The Organic Law on Personal Data Protection (LOPDP) was published in the Fifth Supplement of Official Register 459 on May 26, 2021, and its penalty regime took effect two years later. If your business serves customers on WhatsApp with an AI agent, the law applies just as if a person were replying, and since March 2026 there is also a rule from the Superintendency written for artificial intelligence.
Who is who?
The law calls the one who decides on the purpose and processing of data the controller, and the one who processes it in the name and on behalf of a controller the processor (article 4). The relationship between the two must be governed by a contract (article 34). If your company runs its agent on a platform, your company is the controller and the platform, the processor.
What does the law require in a conversation?
| Obligation | Article | In a chat with an agent |
|---|---|---|
| Legal basis | 7 | Consent, contract, legitimate interest or another of the eight |
| Consent, when it is the basis | 8 | Free, specific, informed and unambiguous, withdrawable without justification |
| Inform when collecting data | 12 | Purpose, legal basis, controller and automated decisions, at the start |
| Access, correction, deletion and objection | 13 to 16 | Answer within 15 days |
| Automated decisions | 20 | The person may ask for an explanation and challenge it |
| Sensitive data and minors’ data | 21, 25 and 26 | Prohibited save exceptions, with specific rules for children and adolescents |
| Security | 37 | Measures suited to the risk, at the processor too |
| Security breach | 43 and 46 | Notice to the Authority in 5 days and to the data subject in 3 |
| International transfer | 55 to 61 | To adequate countries, with safeguards or under the exceptions |
Article 12 lists seventeen items to disclose to the data subject. They include the purposes, the legal basis, the retention period, the controller’s identity and contact details, transfers and the existence of automated assessments and decisions, including profiling. When data is collected from the data subject, they are informed at the very moment of collection.
What changes when an AI agent is the one replying?
- You have to say it is automated. The Superintendency’s general rule on personal data in the use of artificial intelligence systems, signed on February 12, 2026 and published in Official Register 240 on March 10, calls whoever provides a service through an AI system a «deployer». It requires informing the data subject, clearly, specifically and transparently, of the processing done with AI, including its purposes and its automated nature, and calls for risk management and impact assessment.
- Decisions with consequences go through a person. Article 20 lets people refuse decisions based solely or partly on automated processes. If your agent decides something that affects someone, such as denying a service, leave the final decision to your team.
- Data leaves the country. An AI agent usually relies on providers in other countries, and the law regulates that transfer in articles 55 to 61. Say so in what you tell the data subject.
How Meteor does it
- Roles in writing. Meteor’s Terms state that the customer is the Controller and Meteor the Processor, handling data only under the customer’s documented instructions (clause 16.1). Clause 16.2 places on the customer the legal basis to process data with AI and send it to model providers located outside the country, and clause 16.6 says it may be processed in the United States and other jurisdictions.
- You tell the Met how to greet. The Met’s prompt is content in your workspace: that is where you instruct it to say in the first message that an AI agent is answering, what the data is used for and where your policy is.
- The record, on the contact. The Met can leave a note or a tag on the contact in the CRM with what they were told and when. Clause 17.1 of the Terms keeps conversation records while the account has an active plan and for up to 30 days after, unless the law requires another period or you configure a different retention.
- Incidents. Clause 16.8 requires Meteor to notify you within 72 hours of confirming an incident affecting data under its control. Notifying the Superintendency and the data subjects stays with you, within the deadlines of articles 43 and 46.
- Objecting to advertising. Broadcasts leave out contacts whose «Suscrito» (subscribed) field is off on their profile, and a contact who stops promotions from WhatsApp is marked that way on Meta’s first rejection.
- Handing over to a person is a Met tool: a data rights request or a decision that should not rest on the agent alone goes to your team, as the WhatsApp agent page explains.
The Ecuador page (in Spanish) shows the connections available in the country. What Meteor does not do for you: write your policy, keep your record of processing activities or appoint your data protection officer.
What this is not
This is not legal advice. The law is cited by article from its text published on gob.ec, together with the May 2026 amendment to article 43 and the Superintendency’s resolutions, accessed on October 28, 2026. Before adjusting your policy, review it with a lawyer in Ecuador.
The limits
What this article does NOT answer
We would rather say it here than leave you hunting for something that is not there.
-
It is not legal advice and does not replace a review of your policy and your record of processing activities by a lawyer in Ecuador. It cites the articles so you know what to check.
-
It does not cover the law’s General Regulation (Executive Decree 904 of 2023) or the detail of the Superintendency’s resolutions on the data protection officer, transfers or impact assessments.
-
It does not cover the amendment the Superintendency made to its AI rule in September 2026: when you consult it, check the version in force.
-
It does not cover public sector entities, which have their own rules in the same law.
-
It does not discuss Colombia or Mexico: there, Law 1581 of 2012 and the 2025 federal law apply.
Keep going
What this article mentions, in detail
The integrations, the Mets and the automations named above, each with its own page.
- Section
WhatsApp AI agent
The WhatsApp agent page explains when a Met hands over to a person, which is the route for a data rights request or for reviewing an automated decision.
- Integration
CRM de Meteor
The CRM keeps the contact with its notes, tags and «Suscrito» (subscribed) field, which is where the record of what they were told, and of any objection to advertising, lives.
- Industry
WhatsApp Customer Support
The WhatsApp customer service solution shows the support flow where the data of whoever writes in is collected and when a person steps in.
- Integration
Contífico
The Contifico sheet shows which invoicing data a Met looks up in chat in Ecuador and what stays reserved for the operator on the web platform.
Where it comes from
Sources
Everything this article claims that we did not measure ourselves, with its origin.
- Organic Law on Personal Data Protection, record and published text (accessed 2026-10-28) Gob.ec, Regulations
- Official Register, Fifth Supplement 290, amendment to article 43 by the Organic Law to Strengthen Cybersecurity (accessed 2026-10-28) Constitutional Court of Ecuador, Official Register archive
- Resolutions of the Superintendency of Personal Data Protection (accessed 2026-10-28) Superintendency of Personal Data Protection
- General rule on personal data in the use of artificial intelligence systems (accessed 2026-10-28) Superintendency of Personal Data Protection
Frequently asked
Questions on this topic
The Superintendency of Personal Data Protection. Its first superintendent took office before the National Assembly on April 23, 2024, and since 2025 the Superintendency has issued resolutions on data protection officers, transfers, fines and artificial intelligence.
No. Article 7 recognizes eight legal bases, including consent, pre-contractual measures or a contract, and legitimate interest. If you rely on consent, article 8 requires it to be free, specific, informed and unambiguous, and it can be withdrawn at any time without justification.
Article 20 gives the right not to be subject to a decision based solely or partly on assessments produced by automated processes, and to ask for an explanation, submit observations and challenge it. It has exceptions, such as a decision needed for a contract, authorized by law or based on explicit consent.
Article 43, as worded by the May 2026 amendment, requires notifying the Authority, the competent regulatory body and, for information and technical coordination, the relevant CSIRT, within five days at the latest. Article 46 requires notifying the data subject within three days of becoming aware, when it carries a risk to their rights and freedoms.
Article 16 gives the right to object at any time to processing for direct marketing. The Organic Telecommunications Law also recognizes the right not to receive direct sales messages that were not authorized in advance and expressly. WhatsApp, for its part, requires the person to have agreed to receive messages from your business.
For a private company or a state-owned enterprise, minor infringements range from 0.1% to 0.7% of the previous year’s turnover (article 71) and serious ones from 0.7% to 1% (article 72).
Keep reading
Other articles on the same thing
Integrations and data
Data protection in Argentina and AI agents on WhatsApp: what Law 25,326 requires
What does Argentina’s personal data law require if an AI agent serves my customers on WhatsApp?
- Author
- Equipo editorial de Meteor
- Published
- Reading time
- 4 min read
Integrations and data
Habeas data and AI agents on WhatsApp: what Colombia’s Law 1581 requires
What do I need to comply with under Law 1581 if an AI agent serves my customers on WhatsApp in Colombia?
- Author
- Daniel Vargas
- Published
- Reading time
- 5 min read
WhatsApp and channels
Unofficial WhatsApp APIs: what you risk and what Meta’s terms say
Is it safe to use an unofficial WhatsApp API to automate my business?
- Author
- Alejandro Kratc
- Published
- Reading time
- 4 min read
Want to see it running on your operation?
We show it with your own accounts connected, not with a canned demo.